Why were they banned?
 

I realize they were trolling, but as far as they have said, Impracticable had onyl 1 infraction and alt.total-loser and cpheoix both had no infraction. Don't you think they should have actually gotten warnings?

They go around parading, thinking it's funny to insult so many people. If that's what they think of AHS and its members, they have no business being here.

Nope, they completely overstepped the line in their behaviour. Why should we allow people who clearly hate the site to stick around here? AHS is a forum for Ayumi/Jpop fans, not racist homophobes.

But how was Impracticable a Homophobe? He is gay ...

Do you seriously think a warning would've made these people stop? They were doing it all on purpose, and knew they were breaking the rules.

They were banned? THANK YOU! Read the trash can if youre in doubt as to why..

Yeah but it wasn't THAT bad. It's not like they were going around in every separate forum posting this. They did it in the trash can.

It could have been MUCH worse.

Thread after thread closed, and they kept opening new ones. :shakehead

Not to be mean, but I am so glad they're FINALLY gone :faint

I know, it was getting REALLY old. If anyone wants to see pure spam, look at their "response" threads version 1, 2, 3

Hopefully it's alright that I comment on it. What bothered me above all was the they all contributed to a thread in the Trash about me, which said, and I quote, "BONDINGO IS LAME". Beyond being embarrassing, that's just outright offensive and obviously shows that the criticism I gave them in the AHS Article thread was not taken well. Impracticable has been spamming the board for so long now that even before this I was quite surprised he hadn't been banned yet. I know he said he was banned before, so I'm not sure what that's about, but I know that having any of them around longer would have just caused more offense.

Look, we could sit here and argue this point until the cow's come home, the sky turns green, or childish idiot's grow up. End of the day, they got a completely deserved ban, which shall never be lifted for the simple fact that a temp ban would never make a difference. They took it to a point where infraction's/warning's were pointless.

*waits for the next group of rebels*

This always happens, lol. Every year there is this certain group of ppl that get banned by the end of each year and then the next year the cycle starts all over again.

2006 owned!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And all their other threads that were closed before. :irked Those response threads were really unnecesary. If they were worried about being banned, I'm sure they would have PMed Bondingo instead. It's obvious that they wanted the spotlight.

They probably expected a ban, but wanted what so many other attention seeking ex-member's wanted... to go out in a blaze of glory. Kinda back fired when a lot of people just didn't really care that much

^ :laugh

It came out of nowhere.. all of a sudden they just blew up and that other guy started 5 year old like attacks against bondingo. I don't understand why someone would argue with the banning? If Weslicious wasn't an obvious banning situation, this one was. Why even go "it could've be worse" ??

^^

I did'nt even notice what was going on until everyone just started talking about them.

I'm still like WTF with most of what happend.

They did it for the thrill I guess. :shrug I remember we'd do some stupid things back in the day, but never go as far as making such insulting remarks about people :no Anyways I suspected them all along- I can't say that I expected them to do something like this, but I can't say that I didn't expect it either. Ah well, we'll see what new crowd next year brings us :S

^ The difference between the old crowd of rebel's and the "next gen" is that we (hey, i was a rebel at some point too!)/you guys knew when to stop. You never took it to offensive levels. I know one or two people were hurt by the comments on that page.

So? They were all hurt by your sudden decision to ban them ... And didn't you guys say it takes time to decide on banning someone? This was pretty instant ...

Yeah I'm sure they were sooo hurt. How can you be hurt about being banned from a place you talk so much **** about?

I was actually pissed off at the racist/homophobic comments. The comments about the mods too. I may not have always liked the mods before, but a lot of you guys are great, you join us all in conversations and have a good time with us. :) You guys definitely didn't deserve any of that. And as for the racist comment, that was just low. Zef is an awesome guy, and you know what? I think it's pretty hypocritical to use such bad terms against him, when he's not the only "black" person here. And to go saying all those bad things about him, simply because of the color of his skin, when you have someone under the "LOVE" list.. it's just so hypocritical. :no

They were hurt? so what, they brought it on themselves. Why cut yourself if you don't wanna feel any pain? And it was pretty much decided that whenever we found out who was in on the article, they would be banned, so it was hardly rushed.

Well yeh, but this is also from the same article that state's AHS hates lesbians, yet also is full of them...

But that was outside of AHS. Do they not have freedom of Speech?

:yes nothing more to say about this "incident"

They're allowed as much freedom of speech as they can cram into an ED page without any problems at all... but then bringing said page to the forum... that stops it being "outside" of AHS

Also, Neither alt.total-loser or Cpheoix had ANY take in the article. It was all written by Impracticable. Don't you think you should at least ban them since you are, as far as you say, banning them for something they didn't do?]

Also, you said they were banned for the article, yet they say their messages all said they were banned for trolling.

If you are going to say stuff, please get your own facts straight as to not confuse the rest of us?

lulz hi impracticable














lulz bye impracticable

banhammer!

That was immature and just about as offensive as what they said. Doesn't this mean you should be banned as well?

So the reason Han<3 has been so defensive of them is because "they" (is that bad grammar too?) were Impracticable all along? Well that makes sense then. I was wondering why anyone would dare defend them.

And if Hana<3 isn't Impracticable, then have some respect for bulmasman.

mm.. no, not really :no the rest of us aren't confused or offended.

Also, Impracticable will probably take the whole blame for everything. I know him pretty well and if you ask him, he will probably take the blame. It was his idea for alt.total-loser to post it and for cphoeix to get involved. He wrote and made the whole article originally without anyone else knowing. I'm not mad that he is banned, because he deserved it, but you could at least un ban alt.total-loser and Cphoeix and give them an infraction seeing as what they did wasn't that bad. not nearly.

I'm sorry, but this thread is now becoming a joke. I literally laughed out loud at all of Hana<3's last post. It's obvious you're Impracticable. "He" denied he wrote the article to shift blame from that, and now "you" are saying he deserved the ban to shift suspicion. Sounds oddly familiar.I wonder how you know him so well.

Seriously, who tries to defend this kind of behavior? Absolutely ridiculous. Get some common sense people! Damn.

I know this may sound a little stupid on my part but I'm a little confused, is Hana <3 Impracticable as well as alt.total-loser and cphoeix?

I'm pretty positive Hana<3 is Impracticable. As for the other two, I think alt.total-loser was her own being and cnfvfefwhatever was...I don't know actually. See people...

http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c4...o/Arguecat.png

I always wanted to use that picture :D

Banned.

you know, I don't really recall seeing Hana <3 before this.

^ Me niether

With people being so (badly) manipulative, im confused too.

Oh man, I lol'ed :laugh

I love that picture! :clapclap:laugh

Thread closed, there's enough proof to show that Hana and Impracticable are indeed one and the same. I wouldn't throw out an accusation such as that without something concrete to back it up.