Quote:
Originally Posted by ImpactBreaker
LOL people...don't be too naive  There's a reason why they chose a bad picture, and there's really not much to wonder "why". That's a tricky resource in journalism. When you want to bring some news into a negative light, specially to those involved in the bad news, they try to put pictures as raw and unproduced as possible, so that it might cause some "anger" towards the "criminals" for those reading the news. When a politician is involved in huge scandals here in Brazil, they put his picture in the main page of the most famous news magazines, with his face asll sweaty and all pores visible so that it will cause a disgusting feeling for those reading. When they want to bring a news that a woman is incredible beautiful, they photoshop her to have crystal clear skin and amke an excellent job on the make up so that they can really sell what they're implying. |
Hahahaha do I have bad tastes? Based on what you just wrote about putting a person into the most negative light possible, you'd think they choose a more grotesque picture of her lolol. I mean she could definitely look better but it's not the absolute worse I've seen of her heh.
Also, not only that but the way they write the article to make it seem worse than it really is with the clear intent of moving copies. If I'm not mistaken that's one of the main characteristics defining a tabloid. Quite unfortunate, really. I'm going to wait for some more articles to pop up and see what they have to say. Hopefully they give me pure untainted journalism.