Quote:
Originally Posted by fantasma3c
Its not only about making money always. It's about making the patient happy. What some people don't get is that either way if you don't make the patient happy, you get in trouble, and when you do you WARN them what are the side effects. And well see the doctor tried to get him off it without him knowing. But meh it happens. MJ is gone and hes living it better.
|
I'm not bringing that into a controversial point. Giving support to someone is not just giving in to what they want. A good parent is not that who just give gifts and praise their children, but also knows the right moment when they also need limits to be pushed. A good doctor is not just the one who says their patients are right in everything they do and give in to every single need they want. There's a reason why certain medications are for controlled use, and even doctors need to have a special registration and their prescription needs to be supervisioned. A doctor that just gives in to whatever their patients wants, to the point of destroying and killing them, and also by that affecting several other people, like michael's children, surely is a criminal that only thinks about money and don't really care for any "happiness", because they can't see the bigger picture, they just cna see the michael desperately paying them to illegaly provide drugs that can only be used for specific medical purporses that michael didn't really have. I still can't understnad how propofol appeared in this contest if not just to satisfy an addiction, which is osmething doctors should treat instead of feeding. The treatment of a drug addict is not just giving them happiness by saciating their abstinence with the same drugs they're getting tolerance and dependency so that they can sink the rest of their lives into profound addiction til they die and destroy their lives and that of others. And getting rid of a disorder that causes a lot of suffering sometimes need extra effort and some suffering as well, unfortunately, is not just about being happy if you want to achieve health (for instance a person who has cancer and wants to live has to go suffer through the horrible chemoterapy sessions and someone who has HIV has to take all those drugs full of terrible side effects in order not to develop or suffer form AIDS complications so soon).
Michael was clearly debilitated from his addiction to these potent medications. I was thinking he might have had a terminal disease, reason why the doctors were a little lax about the medications they prescribed since he'd supposedly die anyway(just like a doctor gets lax about prescribing high doses of morphine to a patient with terminal cancer, since treating their pain and suffering is definitely by far more importqant than any addiction and is perfectly justifiable in these cases), and in that case, maybe I'd be able to understand the ocncept of providing happiness by lessening the suffering (with the extremer caution not to end up killing him though, because that would jump out of the purporse). Apparently his necropsy showed no signs of other ilness though.