[freedreamer]

I was busy quoting stuff on the other thread and it has reached the limit so..

Originally Posted by Tom Punks

So I guess what Ayu's trying to say is that the covers aren't supposed to be straight up trashy to be trashy, they're trashy because they're supposed to portray a party queen who is sad and doesn't want to live that kind of life anymore. Or something.

That kind of explains them, actually. In the CD+DVD cover, she's smiling, but the room is trashed like she got upset and threw everything all over the place. In the CD only cover, she's smiling, but she's holding a tissue as if she were crying into it or something.

That explains why the album was called a concept album, and why it looks like it starts off with only a few party songs and then heads into a ******** of rockish songs. It's probably somewhat a story about a girl who is a party queen and then changes or something lol.

I think Party Queen opening the album to fit this sentiment would then be very important because then the mood of the album would develop. And it really does seem like the mid section of the album feels slightly more angsty in terms of title-ing as compared to the first 3 songs. That said, after seeing what she had to say on tweeter, my interest in the album has gone up many many times.

Originally Posted by truehappiness

I think we will probably get something completely new. She mentioned that she shot the covers for the album (and that is what she said, ALBUM COVERS) in London so there's a high chance that these are fake-out covers in a way.

That would be really awesome

Originally Posted by LUOYUXIANG

Well, I actually believe that you will be satisfied this time, because "how beautiful you are" seems to be the only ballade in this album, apart from an interlude before it.

Is this official???

Originally Posted by toniayu

Ayu said that the cover was done in London and also that it was the London version of Love songs

REALLY?!