Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrenekoi
Funny coming from a Britney fan... 
I don't think those covers are any more sexy than the Duty one where she is posing as a furry pin-up. And her whole career is really sexualized, so I don't get the complain. |
I never said I like Britney because of the images she creates through covers or videos. Actually I don't like a whole lot of them because of the same reason I stated above.
And like I already said, there is meaning behind the Duty cover and furthermore it actually critises the sexual objectification. Same goes for the Sparkle video for example.
The only thing the new covers do is portraying Ayu as a sexy and like a 20 year old looking woman (or girl) who's an available object to men and just waits to get fucked.
I'm pretty sure that's the reason why most of her fans like the covers. Most people don't want women do make a cover with some meaning behind it, they want them as beautiful, sexy and available objects. I'm tierd of it. Too bad no one here ever cared for the (miss)understood covers and was thinking just one second about the symbolism behind it. Those covers are so great. But people prefer to think of them as ugly and "monkey smile" just because Ayu isn't beautiful or sexy on them.
Says a lot about how people see women and how much they actually value the "old" Ayu when they like erokawaii Ayu.
(And there is a BIG difference how men and women are portrayed. Women are sexual objects while men are sexual subjects)