[2004] Which portable audio Player do u prefer? - Page 2 - Ayumi Hamasaki Sekai
Ayumi Hamasaki Sekai
· Ayu's Official Site · Ayu's twitter · Ayu's YouTube · masa's translations · Misa-chan's translations ·


Go Back   Ayumi Hamasaki Sekai > Music Forums > General Music Chat

Notices

View Poll Results: Choose a portable audio player u perfer!!
CD Player 9 13.43%
MD Player 7 10.45%
Mp3 player 51 76.12%
Cassette Player !!!!! 0 0%
Voters: 67. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 25th May 2004, 01:31 PM
tl1029530921's Avatar
tl1029530921 tl1029530921 is offline
theme of a-nation '03 Initiate
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago!
Posts: 4,810
i WANT an iPod...but i have a MP3/CD player right now..^^. And yea...i also have a casette player in my car..haha...but it really doesnt matter cuz i have the adapter thingy, and even if we DID have a CD player in our car, i prolly wouldnt use it cuz all my CD's are Data CDs(mp3). but then...dont they have those special CD player thingies..??
__________________

XANGA
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 26th May 2004, 08:38 PM
HanabiChick's Avatar
HanabiChick HanabiChick is offline
HAPPY ENDING Initiate
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hill Valley
Posts: 6,974
I like the mp3/CD player I have - best of both
__________________

"Once you turn into a memory, you exist inside me forever
& that's the cruelest thing there is..."
-18.12.08- -25.06.09- -29.02.12- -06.08.13-


. . . . . .
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 1st June 2004, 09:54 AM
Chrono's Avatar
Chrono Chrono is offline
SURREAL Initiate
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rotterdam
Posts: 1,602
well, i have all 4 of them =P. Though the cassette player isn't very often used. haha. usually i use mp3 or cd players.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 1st June 2004, 08:06 PM
SurrealDreams's Avatar
SurrealDreams SurrealDreams is offline
Evolution Wind

 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: 英國
Posts: 3,423
I use my portable MD recorder now. My CD discman is too bulky and skips easily. Mp3 players look good, but its features are not essential. By the time I feel I need a new portable player, probably in a few years time, i'd probably look into the now new Hi-MD more (mainly because it uses discs which I can take anywhere unlike things like i-pod).
__________________

Merry * Christmas ! * *
* * * * *

i'm ditching my old 5 years unchanged sig to something else soon so watch this space if u like reading sigs
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 1st June 2004, 08:33 PM
Unimatrix Prime™'s Avatar
Unimatrix Prime™ Unimatrix Prime™ is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: ::Infinity::
Posts: 13,001
Unlike MD players, you can just plug in an MP3 player to your computer and add/delete songs as you would any other drive. Also, modern MP3 players can store well over 40GB of both music and data. If you're on a very long trip, you can play days worth of songs without having to change discs or worry about scratching the discs. Plus, if you've got an MP3 player with a video display, you can watch movies and play MP3s with 1 unit
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 1st June 2004, 11:05 PM
Luna Saisho's Avatar
Luna Saisho Luna Saisho is offline
Who... Initiate
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In the dangerous depths of her own brain
Posts: 1,138
I agree that MP3 players are much better then MD players, but MD has it's merits. It does have better sound quality (then 128k rips) and new software makes using it just like most MP3 players.

Did anyone get any benifit from my ripping guide?
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 1st June 2004, 11:56 PM
SurrealDreams's Avatar
SurrealDreams SurrealDreams is offline
Evolution Wind

 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: 英國
Posts: 3,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luna Saisho
I agree that MP3 players are much better then MD players, but MD has it's merits. It does have better sound quality (then 128k rips) and new software makes using it just like most MP3 players.
I thought things like I-pods can store uncompressed aiff? or wav.
__________________

Merry * Christmas ! * *
* * * * *

i'm ditching my old 5 years unchanged sig to something else soon so watch this space if u like reading sigs
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 2nd June 2004, 12:29 AM
mrAznnizeguy's Avatar
mrAznnizeguy mrAznnizeguy is offline
End roll Initiate
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: california
Posts: 776
i bought the md player that ayumi advertised for her nwts theme song. it was pretty good, but the only problem i have is that i dont know how to get those portable speackers to light up while playing it=/ but yeaht i would choose md player, just that theyre kinda expensive
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 2nd June 2004, 01:04 AM
Luna Saisho's Avatar
Luna Saisho Luna Saisho is offline
Who... Initiate
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In the dangerous depths of her own brain
Posts: 1,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by SurrealDreams
I thought things like I-pods can store uncompressed aiff? or wav.
It all depends on the player. Some can, some can't. But why would you want to store an uncompressed version on any portable player? An uncompressed WAV or similar is literally 10 times larger then the compressed one, meaning a 4mb song would be 40mb. This turns a 128mb player into something that can store only 3 songs instead of 30.

My RioVolt will play WMA and MP3 and that's about all I care to put on a disc. ^_^
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 2nd June 2004, 01:11 AM
Unimatrix Prime™'s Avatar
Unimatrix Prime™ Unimatrix Prime™ is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: ::Infinity::
Posts: 13,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luna Saisho
I agree that MP3 players are much better then MD players, but MD has it's merits. It does have better sound quality (then 128k rips) and new software makes using it just like most MP3 players.

Did anyone get any benifit from my ripping guide?
I don't have an MD player, obviously, but do they show ID3 tags like MP3 players do? I know I wouldn't want to browse thru songs and have them called "Track 1", "Track 2", etc. Also, aren't the discs themselves expensive? I've heard that you can compress them in such a way that they can store several times more than normal, but most MP3 players can store 10-100 times more than what the MD compression can offer

(btw, I'm not trying to make MDs seem bad or useless. I'm just wondering about a few things about it)
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 2nd June 2004, 01:59 AM
SurrealDreams's Avatar
SurrealDreams SurrealDreams is offline
Evolution Wind

 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: 英國
Posts: 3,423
Luna - haha, i realise uncompressed files wont be practical on smaller storages like 128MB (3 songs on an mp3 player? haha), but arent the I-Pods have something like 20 or 40GB? then uncompressed would be alright. and yep, i would want that (call me audiophile geek, my ears are just sensitive)

Unimatrix Prime™ -
Quote:
don't have an MD player, obviously, but do they show ID3 tags like MP3 players do? I know I wouldn't want to browse thru songs and have them called "Track 1", "Track 2", etc. Also, aren't the discs themselves expensive? I've heard that you can compress them in such a way that they can store several times more than normal, but most MP3 players can store 10-100 times more than what the MD compression can offer
Nope they dont have tags, but u can name each individual track manually via the buttons on the MD recorder, or if the minidisc is recorded optical digitally from a CD player, and that the CD itself has track/artist names on them, those names would be automatically transfered to the MD (however i think both the CD player and the MD player needs to have this text transfering feature - but mine are old they both dont).

the MDs comes in 60, 75 and 80 minutes varities, but it can record in mono and newer MD recorders can record 'long play' which each of them can halve the recording time. say it was recorded normal (short play) in stereo it's max 80 minutes on the disc - record in long play AND mono it can make it 240 minutes max.

the minidiscs arent expensive.
__________________

Merry * Christmas ! * *
* * * * *

i'm ditching my old 5 years unchanged sig to something else soon so watch this space if u like reading sigs
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 2nd June 2004, 06:50 PM
Luna Saisho's Avatar
Luna Saisho Luna Saisho is offline
Who... Initiate
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In the dangerous depths of her own brain
Posts: 1,138
Surreal, I would recommend experimenting with compression in MP3. If I had the space, I'd post some examples of quality so you could hear the difference. A good rip in MP3 can sound astounding. ^_^
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 7th June 2004, 07:37 AM
leafyamazaki's Avatar
leafyamazaki leafyamazaki is offline
ANGEL'S SONG Initiate
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sol III
Posts: 5,341
I chose CD player...

*hugs Panasonic portable cd player* ^^;;
__________________

Switch FC: SW-5149-1993-9785 | Battletag: leafshino#1780
Instagram | Twitter | Tumblr | PSN
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 8th June 2004, 07:21 AM
starr5245's Avatar
starr5245 starr5245 is offline
WE WISH Initiate
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,125
that's obvious..i want an mp3 player which can store up to 2000 songs!
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11th June 2004, 10:55 PM
mrAznnizeguy's Avatar
mrAznnizeguy mrAznnizeguy is offline
End roll Initiate
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: california
Posts: 776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unimatrix Prime™
I don't have an MD player, obviously, but do they show ID3 tags like MP3 players do? I know I wouldn't want to browse thru songs and have them called "Track 1", "Track 2", etc. Also, aren't the discs themselves expensive? I've heard that you can compress them in such a way that they can store several times more than normal, but most MP3 players can store 10-100 times more than what the MD compression can offer

(btw, I'm not trying to make MDs seem bad or useless. I'm just wondering about a few things about it)

my md player, you could name the songs, the artists, and name the disk. the disk themselves are not expensive at all, and usually when you buy md they come with pack of 5 disks, which is more than enough because one disk could store more than 30 songs.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11th June 2004, 11:38 PM
delerium's Avatar
delerium delerium is offline
Two of us Initiate
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Philly suburbs
Posts: 236
iPod baby!

I listen to music mostly in my car... which makes the iPod ideal. The touch scroll wheel and interface makes track/playlist navigation a breeze while you are driving. Previously I was using a JVC in dash MP3-CD player. But it became a bit of pain because I was swapping discs so much. The plus was the JVC has a front input jack, so i can plug my ipod in directly... no FM modulation for me.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 28th October 2007, 07:27 PM
HybridTheory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
More thread regurgitation from AHS..? Hmm interesting...
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 28th October 2007, 07:27 PM
Miku's Avatar
Miku Miku is offline
fairyland Initiate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ryohei Kimura's bed
Posts: 8,204
i <3 my Mp3-player ^^
Creative Zen V
__________________


|| Switch FC: SW-6768-6471-0697||

Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 28th October 2007, 08:15 PM
Ryuuzaki's Avatar
Ryuuzaki Ryuuzaki is offline
Initiate
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,283
mp3 player
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 29th October 2007, 02:49 AM
extepan's Avatar
extepan extepan is offline
Mirror Initiate
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 12,337
mp 3 player of course. cd and casettes are so last century!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.