Why were they banned? - Page 2

Hana<3 · #21 13th December 2007, 02:59 AM

So? They were all hurt by your sudden decision to ban them ... And didn't you guys say it takes time to decide on banning someone? This was pretty instant ...

#22 13th December 2007, 03:02 AM

Yeah I'm sure they were sooo hurt. How can you be hurt about being banned from a place you talk so much **** about?

I was actually pissed off at the racist/homophobic comments. The comments about the mods too. I may not have always liked the mods before, but a lot of you guys are great, you join us all in conversations and have a good time with us.

You guys definitely didn't deserve any of that. And as for the racist comment, that was just low. Zef is an awesome guy, and you know what? I think it's pretty hypocritical to use such bad terms against him, when he's not the only "black" person here. And to go saying all those bad things about him, simply because of the color of his skin, when you have someone under the "LOVE" list.. it's just so hypocritical.

***bulmasman*** · #23 13th December 2007, 03:03 AM

They were hurt? so what, they brought it on themselves. Why cut yourself if you don't wanna feel any pain? And it was pretty much decided that whenever we found out who was in on the article, they would be banned, so it was hardly rushed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by .llama

And to go saying all those bad things about him, simply because of the color of his skin, when you have someone under the "LOVE" list.. it's just so hypocritical.

Well yeh, but this is also from the same article that state's AHS hates lesbians, yet also is full of them...

Hana<3 · #24 13th December 2007, 03:04 AM

But that was outside of AHS. Do they not have freedom of Speech?

**zoomzoom** · #25 13th December 2007, 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bulmasman

They were hurt? so what, they brought it on themselves. Why cut yourself if you don't wanna feel any pain?

nothing more to say about this "incident"

***bulmasman*** · #26 13th December 2007, 03:06 AM

They're allowed as much freedom of speech as they can cram into an ED page without any problems at all... but then bringing said page to the forum... that stops it being "outside" of AHS

Hana<3 · #27 13th December 2007, 03:07 AM

Also, Neither alt.total-loser or Cpheoix had ANY take in the article. It was all written by Impracticable. Don't you think you should at least ban them since you are, as far as you say, banning them for something they didn't do?]

Also, you said they were banned for the article, yet they say their messages all said they were banned for trolling.

If you are going to say stuff, please get your own facts straight as to not confuse the rest of us?

***bulmasman*** · #28 13th December 2007, 03:11 AM

lulz hi impracticable

lulz bye impracticable

banhammer!

Hana<3 · #29 13th December 2007, 03:13 AM

That was immature and just about as offensive as what they said. Doesn't this mean you should be banned as well?

bondingo · #30 13th December 2007, 03:15 AM

So the reason Han<3 has been so defensive of them is because "they" (is that bad grammar too?) were Impracticable all along? Well that makes sense then. I was wondering why anyone would dare defend them.

And if Hana<3 isn't Impracticable, then have some respect for bulmasman.

#31 13th December 2007, 03:15 AM

mm.. no, not really

the rest of us aren't confused or offended.

Hana<3 · #32 13th December 2007, 03:16 AM

Also, Impracticable will probably take the whole blame for everything. I know him pretty well and if you ask him, he will probably take the blame. It was his idea for alt.total-loser to post it and for cphoeix to get involved. He wrote and made the whole article originally without anyone else knowing. I'm not mad that he is banned, because he deserved it, but you could at least un ban alt.total-loser and Cphoeix and give them an infraction seeing as what they did wasn't that bad. not nearly.

bondingo · #33 13th December 2007, 03:18 AM

I'm sorry, but this thread is now becoming a joke. I literally laughed out loud at all of Hana<3's last post. It's obvious you're Impracticable. "He" denied he wrote the article to shift blame from that, and now "you" are saying he deserved the ban to shift suspicion. Sounds oddly familiar.I wonder how you know him so well.

Piccolo · #34 13th December 2007, 03:20 AM

Seriously, who tries to defend this kind of behavior? Absolutely ridiculous. Get some common sense people! Damn.

Queen Bee · #35 13th December 2007, 03:21 AM

I know this may sound a little stupid on my part but I'm a little confused, is Hana <3 Impracticable as well as alt.total-loser and cphoeix?

bondingo · #36 13th December 2007, 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ayumi626

I know this may sound a little stupid on my part but I'm a little confused, is Hana <3 Impracticable as well as alt.total-loser and cphoeix?

I'm pretty positive Hana<3 is Impracticable. As for the other two, I think alt.total-loser was her own being and cnfvfefwhatever was...I don't know actually. See people...

I always wanted to use that picture

#37 13th December 2007, 03:24 AM

Banned.

you know, I don't really recall seeing Hana <3 before this.

**zoomzoom** · #38 13th December 2007, 03:24 AM

^ Me niether

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ayumi626

I know this may sound a little stupid on my part but I'm a little confused, is Hana <3 Impracticable as well as alt.total-loser and cphoeix?

With people being so (badly) manipulative, im confused too.

#39 13th December 2007, 03:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bondingo

I always wanted to use that picture

Oh man, I lol'ed

Queen Bee · #40 13th December 2007, 03:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bondingo

I'm pretty positive Hana<3 is Impracticable. As for the other two, I think alt.total-loser was her own being and cnfvfefwhatever was...I don't know actually. See people...

I always wanted to use that picture

I love that picture!