taskinst in ASIA TOUR 2007

[alternarist]

I just re-watched the video of taskinst in ASIA TOUR 2007. So the story of the video begins like this:

Ayu is escorted by 2 policemen (into jail).



The females in the video, somewhat, committed a crime of their own and were all escorted by policemen.

Kayanochi fled with Hide's case of cash. (She was walking with her head held up high.)
Midoring electrocuted Zin to death. (She was grinning evilly.)
Aki-chan shot Gomi to death. (She was struggling.)
Chisa-chan (somewhat) pushed Subaru down the stairs. (She looked as if she is remourseful)



After that, the video showed Shuya fired his gun and after Shuya fired his gun, ayu grabbed the gun away. Shuya fled. The 4 female dancers appeared on stage in "jail".

So how does this relate to ayu being escorted away by 2 policemen at the beginning? I am curious to know!

[kirei_ayumi]

I love how you just analyzed the scene i never thought of it like this...but what did shuya fire his gun at? I don't understand why ayu seem to have gone down with them..maybe she took the blame for him

[truehappiness]

So how does this relate to ayu being escorted away by 2 policemen at the beginning? I am curious to know!

It's simple really. ~

Basically, the video shows what happened AFTER all the guys died and Ayu took the blame for Shu-ya. So from the beginning, we see all of them being brought to jail and then we see WHY they're in jail, then in the actual performance [when they're all sitting and in the jail cells] they're actually in jail.


Your analysis of the crimes is off by a bit..

Kayanochi fled with Hide's case of cash. (She was walking with her head held up high.)
Midoring electrocuted Zin to death. (She was grinning evilly.)
Aki-chan shot Gomi to death. (She was struggling.)
Chisa-chan (somewhat) pushed Subaru down the stairs. (She looked as if she is remourseful)

Kayanocchi and Hide stole the cash together, but she took it for herself.
Midoring probably choked Zin to death due to the fact that she was just holding a phone cord [you can't electrocute someone with a disconnected phone..]
Aki-chan was in a relationship with Gomi, and he was clearly abusive, so she ended up killing him.
Chisa-chan probably wanted to be alone or w/e and accidentally killed Subaru while it looked as though he just like, loved her or.. something.

[alternarist]

Originally Posted by truehappiness

It's simple really. ~Ayu took the blame for Shu-ya.

Ok i get it now. but u could actually stop here.

Originally Posted by truehappiness

Your analysis of the crimes is off by a bit..

Kayanocchi and Hide stole the cash together, but she took it for herself.
Midoring probably choked Zin to death due to the fact that she was just holding a phone cord [you can't electrocute someone with a disconnected phone..]
Aki-chan was in a relationship with Gomi, and he was clearly abusive, so she ended up killing him.
Chisa-chan probably wanted to be alone or w/e and accidentally killed Subaru while it looked as though he just like, loved her or.. something.

I mean, different people analyse different things differently. So who are you to say that i am wrong and your's is right? i duno why whenever you talk i get offended.

But thanks for your answer before that anyway.

[kirei_ayumi]

^to me, it looks like chisa-chan was begging for subaru, looks like she was tugging on his leg, and then he was trying to get rid of her tug so hard that he accidently fell... aki-chan shot gomi, no choice but to do it in self-defense.

[truehappiness]

Originally Posted by kirei_ayumi

^to me, it looks like chisa-chan was begging for subaru, looks like she was tugging on his leg, and then he was trying to get rid of her tug so hard that he accidently fell... aki-chan shot gomi, no choice but to do it in self-defense.

D'oh. I remember now. Chisa was the clingy one and Subaru ended up killing himself by being an ***. :O

I was thrown off.

I mean, different people analyse different things differently. So who are you to say that i am wrong and your's is right?

I think you just answered your own question here.

[alternarist]

Originally Posted by truehappiness

I think you just answered your own question here.

I didnt say mine was right. but i dont go telling pple that their analysis is "off by a bit" when they themselves are not sure what is right.

You realise that you are putting my analysis off because u think that someone cannot eletrocute someone with a disconnected phone. But did you see the exposing wire with a spark??

And did you see any choking of someone by anyone? i dont really care what's ur analysis but You don't see anything then dont tell pple that their analysis is wrong. You take it that my analysis is wrong and den use the word "probably". So you urself isnt sure what's right so who are u to tell me that mine is wrong. it's just ur words seriously. talk less please. i beg you.

[ExodusUK]

Originally Posted by alternarist

I didnt say mine was right. but i dont go telling pple that their analysis is "off by a bit" when they themselves are not sure what is right.

You realise that you are putting my analysis off because u think that someone cannot eletrocute someone with a disconnected phone. But did you see the exposing wire with a spark??

And did you see any choking of someone by anyone? i dont really care what's ur analysis but You don't see anything then dont tell pple that their analysis is wrong. You take it that my analysis is wrong and den use the word "probably". So you urself isnt sure what's right so who are u to tell me that mine is wrong. it's just ur words seriously. talk less please. i beg you.

I agree. I think your analysis was pretty spot on.

[chocopockymaster]

Reminds me a bit of Chicago. Chisa is like the girl who didn't kill her lover, but gets hanged (well, she does kill him, but I think you get where I'm going with this...)

[truehappiness]

You realise that you are putting my analysis off because u think that someone cannot eletrocute someone with a disconnected phone. But did you see the exposing wire with a spark??

I saw the exposed wires, but that just implies that it was ripped off of the connection. Seeing as how the phone is connected to some electrical source, of course there'd be sparks coming from the public phone itself. Since Midoring is holding the phone + the cable in a noose-like position, it can be assumed that she used the cord to kill him in such a fashion. The only way for her to have killed him via electrocution would have been to push him against the wires, but then if she did that, why would she be holding the phone + its cable?

[alternarist]

Originally Posted by truehappiness

it can be assumed that she used the cord to kill him in such a fashion.

ya. it's all ur assumption. So u need to stop telling pple that whatever they say is "off by a bit" and whatever assumption u made "should be" considered right. I may be wrong. but i dont tell pple that their analysis is "off by a bit" and even worse, by correcting them. You need to learn how to accept other people's opinion.

You also need to know that this is an active discussion thread. So why do u constantly come up with ur antics of "no you are wrong" and "my assumptions shld be right"?

How to discuss?

[lfe.]

Originally Posted by alternarist

ya. it's all ur assumption. So u need to stop telling pple that whatever they say is "off by a bit" and whatever assumption u made "should be" considered right. I may be wrong. but i dont tell pple that their analysis is "off by a bit" and even worse, by correcting them. You need to learn how to accept other people's opinion.

You also need to know that this is an active discussion thread. So why do u constantly come up with ur antics of "no you are wrong" and "my assumptions shld be right"?

How to discuss?

I think you should calm down because you're acting more outrageously than you claim truehappiness is being

[zoomzoom]

Originally Posted by lfebaggins

I think you should calm down because you're acting more outrageously than you claim truehappiness is being

He has a habit of that with people.

Anyway, yea she took the blame. And truehappiness was merely looking a little deeper into your analysis, rather than correcting, with the exception of the phone. Besides, does a public phone have enough power in it's circuit to electrocute a human being to death? Seems unlikely.

[Bad Wolf]

Originally Posted by alternarist

ya. it's all ur assumption. So u need to stop telling pple that whatever they say is "off by a bit" and whatever assumption u made "should be" considered right. I may be wrong. but i dont tell pple that their analysis is "off by a bit" and even worse, by correcting them. You need to learn how to accept other people's opinion.

You also need to know that this is an active discussion thread. So why do u constantly come up with ur antics of "no you are wrong" and "my assumptions shld be right"?

How to discuss?

Um, but you were off by a bit because he couldn't have been electrocuted by a phone that wasn't connected to a power source. If it wasn't connected to a power source it doesn't have electricity. You were right that she killed him but just wrong with how she did it.

That's all.

[truehappiness]

I may be wrong. but i dont tell pple that their analysis is "off by a bit" and even worse, by correcting them. You need to learn how to accept other people's opinion.

I guess I just can't handle inaccurate information. @_@

[alternarist]

Originally Posted by truehappiness

I guess I just can't handle inaccurate information. @_@

then its ur own prob and u needa change! it's jus unacceptable when u cant accept others "inaccurate info" when u urself cant provide the, as what many in the forum say, the "FACTS, the OFFICIAL LINKS, the OFFICIAL NEWS" to everything.

You could actually add your points about choking of Zin to death and we can continue on discussing. But the thing that you told me that my analysis is "off by a bit" just makes me think that you know everything but in fact it's just ur assumption. i cant repeat anymore

We do appreciate your efforts in providing speedy, up to date and accurate(sometimes) info. But you are not the answer key to everything u realise. Pls change i beg u on behalf of some other pple in the forum.

Originally Posted by lfebaggins

I think you should calm down because you're acting more outrageously than you claim truehappiness is being

I am calm and i definitely didnt claim that truehappiness is being outrageous. You and your assumptions too.

Originally Posted by zoomzoom

He has a habit of that with people.

ok fine since i provoked you in another thread i forgot which. i shall forgive u this time. i really will not say anymore.

Originally Posted by majrakun

^ lol. Yeah. Sure. Lets make more silly interpretations. That clip is sad though. Ayu sacrificed herself for love. At least the other dancers actually DID the crime. XD Haha.


I think the most logic thing is that all of them cheated on each other.

Oh yeah. Does anybody know how the china version of taskinst look like? 0____o

I just didnt thought that ayu sacrificed and took the blame for shuya. but the video jus look dumb. cos probably shuya was shooting at a cockroach and ayu took the blame for him. i mean they didnt show what shuya was shooting. so i can be anything u noe..

ya i wanna noe what does the china version of taskinst look like!!

[lfe.]

Originally Posted by alternarist

then its ur own prob and u needa change! it's jus unacceptable when u cant accept others "inaccurate info" when u urself cant provide the, as what many in the forum say, the "FACTS, the OFFICIAL LINKS, the OFFICIAL NEWS" to everything.

Originally Posted by alternarist

I am calm and i definitely didnt claim that truehappiness is being outrageous. You and your assumptions too.

Well then, I'd say your problem is communicating with other people. If you were staying claim then you are pretty terrible at showing it. I wasn't even the one you were talking to and I could sense hostility from your responses. Considering you also seemed to provoke zoomzoom in the past I would not say this is the first instance something like this has happened. If you were actually claim my suggestion to you is to be more careful with your wording in the future, that is all.

[maikaru]

It's just a video that appeared in a concert..
No need to get angry at each other. ahaha.
I think what he is trying to say about the phone is..
When the place you talk into is ripped off from the phone,
There's no electricity because it's been ripped from circuit..
So the electricity obviously cannot flow into the handle of the phone..
So he was just saying about how it's more likely to be strangle,
Because of that fact... that there should be no electricity into the phone.

but it's not a big deal... no matter how you interpret,
It's just a lead to the next song.. ahaha..
Time to make the peace!

[keikeiaznqueen]

Well, if the wire was connected to the circuit, even if it's not a complete circuit when it is disconnected, the circuit can be completed again when the wire touches Zin. So technically Zin could have been electricuted. (But I haven't watched the video in a while so I'm not too sure of which side of the broken wire Midoring had been holding. If the wire she was holding was connected to the negative terminal then I think yes, Zin could have been electricuted.)

I really liked the part when Ayu took the blame. She was the coolest one!!!!

[KarenPang]

Originally Posted by maikaru

It's just a video that appeared in a concert..
No need to get angry at each other. ahaha.
I think what he is trying to say about the phone is..
When the place you talk into is ripped off from the phone,
There's no electricity because it's been ripped from circuit..
So the electricity obviously cannot flow into the handle of the phone..
So he was just saying about how it's more likely to be strangle,
Because of that fact... that there should be no electricity into the phone.

but it's not a big deal... no matter how you interpret,
It's just a lead to the next song.. ahaha..
Time to make the peace!

haha that's true

anyway you don't win anything from this no matter how good/bad your interpret the particular scene when taskinst was being played in the ATOS DVD