New song [Microphone] Preview Honda Spark CM!!

[noidea]

Originally Posted by tourniquet

the organ is a synth anyway.

some people like completely original stuff. some like old stuff 'reinvented'. it's not even discussionworthy. as everyone pleases is alright.

completely original stuff doesnt exist because humans are humans, we can't be original, everything we do is inspired by something we know

[tourniquet]

Originally Posted by noidea

completely original stuff doesnt exist because humans are humans, we can't be original, everything we do is inspired by something we know

you needn't apply that hardliner definition to everything.

[hidekirby]

Originally Posted by noidea

completely original stuff doesnt exist because humans are humans, we can't be original, everything we do is inspired by something we know

Mhh I do'nt know... I think you can take inspiration while you're creating original stuff.
One example : Bold & Delicious might not be really original in itself, but in ayu's discography, it's Unique.
That's why I loved (miss)understood for example, it's not really cohesive as an album, but when I listened to it I was really amazed. It sounded so original. Sparkle is another example. There is inspired things like that which are original (to some extent of course).

But I also think that you can create brand new things, with inspiration or not (that's what I'm trying to do right now). Yet, it is really difficult, and it is more difficult as time goes on.

[noidea]

Originally Posted by hidekirby

But I also think that you can create brand new things, with inspiration or not (that's what I'm trying to do right now). Yet, it is really difficult, and it is more difficult as time goes on.

No, that' impossible for a human, we can't do what we don't know yet, it's the way our brains work. You can combine things you know, but it will never be brand new or completely original, it can be different from what you have done before, but that's about it.

[Yoake]

Originally Posted by noidea

No, that' impossible for a human, we can't do what we don't know yet, it's the way our brains work. You can combine things you know, but it will never be brand new or completely original, it can be different from what you have done before, but that's about it.

I agree with you for all kind of art. Human music was inspired by bird music by example. Anyway, the only things they could invent by themselves is weapon and some stuff as needle to do clothes.

[hidekirby]

Originally Posted by Yoake

I agree with you for all kind of art. Human music was inspired by bird music by example. Anyway, the only things they could invent by themselves is weapon and some stuff as needle to do clothes.

So... you can create original things?
I don't share this conception of art. It's a matter of inspiration, of course. But inspiration can lead to originality. If this concept doesn't exist, why is it it used so often? Why this word even exist?

Originally Posted by noidea

No, that' impossible for a human, we can't do what we don't know yet, it's the way our brains work. You can combine things you know, but it will never be brand new or completely original, it can be different from what you have done before, but that's about it.

When the first humans drew on rocks with animal blood, don't tell me that was not original...

I don't want to go off topic that much, but I think it's interesting to talk about such things.