Christina Aguilera: Back to Basics VS Bionic (Past or Future?) - Page 2

Andrenekoi · #21 24th June 2010, 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ストロボ・EdGE

Really? I thought Back to Basics was the /different/ one; not many people can successfully turn a style that was popular half a century ago and rock it as well as she did.

When Back to Basics was released, Joss Stone, Nora Jones and Amy Whinehouse already had retroish soul and jazz albums with strong sales... x_x

She was just re-using something that was "in" 2 years ago

tenshi no hane · #22 24th June 2010, 07:39 PM

^ isn't that what she's doing now as well?

Andrenekoi · #23 24th June 2010, 10:39 PM

^Now she is using something that still is "in" xD

Twinkle ! · #24 24th June 2010, 10:45 PM

although i don't like xtina but i adore back to basics

View Poll Results: which one do you prefer?
Back to Basics (2006)	22	61.11%
Bionic (2010)	14	38.89%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll